1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 678 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Challenger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2730 mm |