1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1996 Opel Calibra
To start off, 1996 Opel Calibra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Opel Calibra. (115 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Calibra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Opel Calibra weights approximately 32 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Opel Calibra (173 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Opel Calibra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1996 Opel Calibra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Opel |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Calibra |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2610 mm |