1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1998 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 343 kg more than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. (88 Nm). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1998 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Sirion |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 88 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 71.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2350 mm |