1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 1999 Dodge Viper
To start off, 1999 Dodge Viper is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 101 kg more than 1999 Dodge Viper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Viper (705 Nm) has 538 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 1999 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Dodge |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Viper |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 705 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1057 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2450 mm |