1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (249 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (309 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Porsche |
Model | 3000 Mk II | Boxster |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2855 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 249 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 309 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 259 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2420 mm |