1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2001 Spyker C8
To start off, 2001 Spyker C8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Spyker C8 (400 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Spyker C8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Spyker C8 weights approximately 192 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 2001 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Spyker |
Model | 3000 Mk II | C8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 400 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |