1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric

To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo Hatric weights approximately 293 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo Hatric (280 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo Hatric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II has manual transmission. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: