1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2002 Ford Mondeo

To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Mondeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 232 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (175 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2002 Ford Mondeo
Make Austin-Healey Ford
Model 3000 Mk II Mondeo
Year Released 1962 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1751 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3950 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 80.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2760 mm