1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Spyker |
Model | 3000 Mk II | C8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |