1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade

To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1509 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2004 Cadillac Escalade
Make Austin-Healey Cadillac
Model 3000 Mk II Escalade
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 5996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 345 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 515 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 102 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 2667 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 5630 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 3310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 117 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]