1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2005 Honda Civic

To start off, 2005 Honda Civic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Honda Civic. (82 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda Civic weights approximately 112 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Honda Civic. (119 Nm). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2005 Honda Civic
Make Austin-Healey Honda
Model 3000 Mk II Civic
Year Released 1962 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 119 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 73.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]