1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Austin-Healey Jeep
Model 3000 Mk II Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1962 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 4703 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 394 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 87 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 78 L