1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2006 Ford Bantam

To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 1698 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2006 Ford Bantam
Make Austin-Healey Ford
Model 3000 Mk II Bantam
Year Released 1962 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 75.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 2856 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 54 L