1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II has manual transmission. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Audi |
Model | 3000 Mk II | A6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2833 mm |