1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 78 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | 3000 Mk II | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2550 mm |