1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2012 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II has manual transmission. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: