1962 Austin Princess vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1962 Austin Princess is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin Princess weights approximately 356 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin Princess | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | 60 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3230 mm |
