1962 Austin Princess vs. 1971 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1971 Cadillac Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1962 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin Princess weights approximately 80 kg more than 1971 Cadillac Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin Princess | 1971 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | Calais |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3310 mm |
