1962 Austin Princess vs. 1986 Citroen Aventure
To start off, 1986 Citroen Aventure is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 1962 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 1962 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin Princess | 1986 Citroen Aventure | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Princess | Aventure |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |