1962 Austin Princess vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin Princess | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |