1962 Austin Princess vs. 2001 Chevrolet Celta
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin Princess weights approximately 505 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Celta.
Because 1962 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin Princess | 2001 Chevrolet Celta | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | Princess | Celta |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1675 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 71 L |
