1962 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2500 (204 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1962 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin Princess weights approximately 475 kg more than 2004 Mazda B2500.

Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin Princess 2004 Mazda B2500
Make Austin Mazda
Model Princess B2500
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 4031 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1705 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2990 mm