1962 Austin Princess vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1962 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin Princess.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin Princess. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1962 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin Princess | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Austin | SsangYong |
Model | Princess | Stavic |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |