1962 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Smart Roadster

To start off, 2008 Smart Roadster is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Roadster. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Roadster. 2008 Smart Roadster has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1962 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin Princess 2008 Smart Roadster
Make Austin Smart
Model Princess Roadster
Year Released 1962 2008
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3993 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 0 HP
Torque 251 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 3430 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 35 L