1962 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1680 kg more than 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina. (36 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Autobianchi Bianchina | 2005 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Dodge |
| Model | Bianchina | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 499 cc | 3703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 36 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 67.4 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 520 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1840 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 83 L |
