1962 BMW 1500 vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1966 Renault 4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 1500 (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 1500 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 1500 weights approximately 393 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1500 | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 1500 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
