1962 BMW 1500 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1500 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4690 mm |