1962 BMW 1500 vs. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 107 kg more than 1962 BMW 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1500 | 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 1500 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |