1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2003 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Seville is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Seville (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 763 kg more than 1962 BMW 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Seville (407 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1500. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1500. 2003 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 1962 BMW 1500 has manual transmission. 1962 BMW 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1500 | 2003 Cadillac Seville | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 1500 | Seville |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1806 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2890 mm |
