1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2004 Daihatsu YRV
To start off, 2004 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daihatsu YRV (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 1500 weights approximately 153 kg more than 2004 Daihatsu YRV.
Because 2004 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daihatsu YRV (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1500. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Daihatsu YRV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1500. 2004 Daihatsu YRV has automatic transmission and 1962 BMW 1500 has manual transmission. 1962 BMW 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Daihatsu YRV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1500 | 2004 Daihatsu YRV | |
Make | BMW | Daihatsu |
Model | 1500 | YRV |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 79.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2360 mm |