1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1379 kg more than 1962 BMW 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1500. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1500 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3510 mm |
