1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2004 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 1500 weights approximately 293 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1500 | 2004 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 1500 | AZ |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |
