1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. Both 1962 BMW 1500 and 2005 Mitsubishi Colt are equipped with a 1,499 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 22 kg more than 1962 BMW 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (211 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1500. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1500. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt has automatic transmission and 1962 BMW 1500 has manual transmission. 1962 BMW 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1500 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1500 | Colt |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 178 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |