1962 BMW 1500 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1500 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1500. (80 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1500.
Because 1962 BMW 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1500. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1500 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | 3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2639 mm |