1962 BMW 1800 vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1964 DKW Munga is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,771 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 1800 (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 1800 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW Munga weights approximately 67 kg more than 1962 BMW 1800.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1800 | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 1800 | Munga |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1771 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 31 L |