1962 BMW 1800 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,771 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Celica weights approximately 52 kg more than 1962 BMW 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 BMW 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1800 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 1800 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1771 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
