1962 BMW 1800 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,771 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 BMW 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 165 kg more than 1962 BMW 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1800 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1800 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1771 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |