1962 BMW 1800 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 757 kg more than 1962 BMW 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1800 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 1800 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1771 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 78 L |