1962 BMW 1800 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 242 kg more than 1962 BMW 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 1800 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 1800 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1771 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
