1962 BMW 1800 vs. 2006 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1800.
Because 1962 BMW 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1800 | 2006 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 1800 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1771 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |