1962 BMW 1800 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1962 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 1800 | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 1800 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1771 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 90 L |