1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 96 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 3200 CS | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 3200 CS | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2960 mm |
