1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 1996 Kia Avella
To start off, 1996 Kia Avella is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 585 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 BMW 3200 CS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 3200 CS | 1996 Kia Avella | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 3200 CS | Avella |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2400 mm |