1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 1999 Kia Retona

To start off, 1999 Kia Retona is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1999 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1999 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Kia Retona weights approximately 370 kg more than 1962 BMW 3200 CS.

Because 1999 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Kia Retona. (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 BMW 3200 CS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Kia Retona.

Compare all specifications:

1962 BMW 3200 CS 1999 Kia Retona
Make BMW Kia
Model 3200 CS Retona
Year Released 1962 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 205 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1870 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4010 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2370 mm