1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 914 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 3200 CS | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 3200 CS | Viper |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 7990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 1154 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |