1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1364 kg more than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 3200 CS | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 3200 CS | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |