1962 BMW 3200 CS vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 346 kg more than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 3200 CS | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 3200 CS | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |