1962 BMW 501 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1964 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 797 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 501 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 501 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2050 mm |