1962 BMW 501 vs. 1997 Acura RL
To start off, 1997 Acura RL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura RL weights approximately 330 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Because 1962 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 BMW 501 | 1997 Acura RL | |
| Make | BMW | Acura |
| Model | 501 | RL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
