1962 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 550 kg more than 1962 BMW 501.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 BMW 501 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 501 | Astro |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 184 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |